[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=UK-Rnto+iH8TSuTyzt010HT8Ujk0TX74hA1D5Lh4HfOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:57:51 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Derek Basehore <dbasehore@...omium.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
sboyd@...nel.org, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: rockchip: Add 1.6GHz PLL rate
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Derek Basehore <dbasehore@...omium.org> wrote:
> We need this rate to generate 100, 200, and 228.57MHz from the same
> PLL. 228.57MHz is useful for a pixel clock when the VPLL is used for
> and external display.
>
> Signed-off-by: Derek Basehore <dbasehore@...omium.org>
> ---
> drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Looks good to me. I spent a little bit of time poking at this and I
agreed it's the best way to make 1.6 GHz in
<http://crosreview.com/956677>. Lin Huang at Rockchip also said:
> yes, we also use this setting for 1.6GHz in our internal branch.
...and they seem to agree this is a sane setting. Thus:
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists