[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180314041249.GA18314@ziepe.ca>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 22:12:49 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
sulrich@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Michal Kalderon <Michal.Kalderon@...ium.com>,
Ariel Elior <Ariel.Elior@...ium.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] RDMA/qedr: eliminate duplicate barriers on
weakly-ordered archs
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:20:24PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> Code includes wmb() followed by writel() in multiple places. writel()
> already has a barrier on some architectures like arm64.
>
> This ends up CPU observing two barriers back to back before executing the
> register write.
>
> Since code already has an explicit barrier call, changing writel() to
> writel_relaxed().
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
> drivers/infiniband/hw/qedr/verbs.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Sure matches my understanding of writel_relaxed
This is part of a series, should we take just this patch through the
rdma tree? If not:
Acked-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Thanks,
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists