[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180314133943.t5dorqzvlieotljx@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:39:43 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: tip-bot for Andy Whitcroft <tipbot@...or.com>,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
dwmw@...zon.co.uk, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, apw@...onical.com, bp@...en8.de,
luto@...nel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dwmw2@...radead.org,
peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/pti] x86/speculation, objtool: Annotate indirect
calls/jumps for objtool on 32-bit kernels
* Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 05:28:01AM -0700, tip-bot for Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> > Commit-ID: a14bff131108faf50cc0cf864589fd71ee216c96
> > Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/a14bff131108faf50cc0cf864589fd71ee216c96
> > Author: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
> > AuthorDate: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:24:27 +0000
> > Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > CommitDate: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:24:31 +0100
> >
> > x86/speculation, objtool: Annotate indirect calls/jumps for objtool on 32-bit kernels
> >
> > In the following commit:
> >
> > 9e0e3c5130e9 ("x86/speculation, objtool: Annotate indirect calls/jumps for objtool")
> >
> > ... we added annotations for CALL_NOSPEC/JMP_NOSPEC on 64-bit x86 kernels,
> > but we did not annotate the 32-bit path.
> >
> > Annotate it similarly.
>
> This patch has no effect because objtool only supports 64-bit kernels.
Yeah, indeed - but it's still a good change for completeness, right?
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists