linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] EDAC, sb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Mar 2018 19:03:06 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] EDAC, sb_edac: Remove VLA usage

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 08:44:49AM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wvla, remove VLA and replace it
> with a fixed-length array instead.
> 
> Fixed as part of the directive to remove all VLAs from
> the kernel: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
>  - Update macro MAX_INTERLEAVE in order to avoid too long lines.
>    This change is based on Mauro's feedback.
>  - Update changelog with Mauro's Reviewed-by.
> 
> Changes in v2:
>  - Use macro max_t to compute the max of all three array sizes.
>    This change is based on Borislav's feedback.
> 
>  drivers/edac/sb_edac.c | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
> index 8721002..aff4778 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
> @@ -110,6 +110,11 @@ static const u32 knl_interleave_list[] = {
>  	0xdc, 0xe4, 0xec, 0xf4, 0xfc, /* 15-19 */
>  	0x104, 0x10c, 0x114, 0x11c,   /* 20-23 */
>  };
> +#define MAX_INTERLEAVE							\
> +	(max_t(unsigned int, ARRAY_SIZE(sbridge_interleave_list),	\
> +	       max_t(unsigned int, ARRAY_SIZE(ibridge_interleave_list),	\
> +		     ARRAY_SIZE(knl_interleave_list))))
> +
>  
>  struct interleave_pkg {
>  	unsigned char start;
> @@ -1899,7 +1904,7 @@ static int get_memory_error_data(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
>  	int			n_rir, n_sads, n_tads, sad_way, sck_xch;
>  	int			sad_interl, idx, base_ch;
>  	int			interleave_mode, shiftup = 0;
> -	unsigned		sad_interleave[pvt->info.max_interleave];

Where's the hunk removing ->max_interleave ?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.