linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10] mmc: Export host capabilities to debugfs.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1521109575.10722.654.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:26:15 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Harish Jenny K N <harish_kandiga@...tor.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>, avri.altman@....com,
        "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vladimir Zapolskiy <Vladimir_Zapolskiy@...tor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] mmc: Export host capabilities to debugfs.

On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 11:12 +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 13 March 2018 at 06:10, Harish Jenny K N <harish_kandiga@...tor.com
> > wrote:
> > 

> Honestly, I don't like this, but maybe other people do, then I am fine
> with this approach.
> 
> If were to decide, I would just rather print the caps field in a
> hexadecimal bit form and leave the translation to the user.

A compromise would be to print both:

0xHHHHHHHH\n
Description of each enabled field, one per line


Another format would be:

Bit XX: Description of a field

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy