linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] soc: imx: gpcv2: Do not pass static memory as platform data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 15 Mar 2018 07:12:34 -0700
From:   Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
To:     Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Cc:     Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] soc: imx: gpcv2: Do not pass static memory as
 platform data

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 6:52 AM, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 06:00:06AM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
>> I am slightly confused by your phrasing. Are you:
>>
>> a) saying that you dropped my patches in favor of your own that use
>> platform_device_add_data()
>>
>> or
>>
>> b) asking me to convert my patches to use platform_device_add_data()?
>>
>> Just trying to figure out if any action on my part is necessary.
>
> Sorry for the blur.  I'm asking you to repost your patches with using
> platform_device_add_data().  In other word, that's b).

OK, cool, will do.

Thanks,
Andrey Smirnov