linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] soc: imx: gpcv2: Do not pass static memory as platform data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180315135225.GK26859@dragon>
Date:   Thu, 15 Mar 2018 21:52:26 +0800
From:   Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To:     Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
Cc:     Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] soc: imx: gpcv2: Do not pass static memory as
 platform data

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 06:00:06AM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> I am slightly confused by your phrasing. Are you:
> 
> a) saying that you dropped my patches in favor of your own that use
> platform_device_add_data()
> 
> or
> 
> b) asking me to convert my patches to use platform_device_add_data()?
> 
> Just trying to figure out if any action on my part is necessary.

Sorry for the blur.  I'm asking you to repost your patches with using
platform_device_add_data().  In other word, that's b).

Shawn