linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers: base: add description for .coredump() callback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180315172719.GB28917@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Mar 2018 18:27:19 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: base: add description for .coredump() callback

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:32:53AM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 3/14/2018 10:06 AM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> > On 2/9/2018 10:13 AM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> > > Commit 3c47d19ff4dc ("drivers: base: add coredump driver ops") added
> > > a new callback in struct device_driver, but not a kerneldoc description
> > > so here it is.
> > 
> > Hi Greg,
> > 
> > Revisiting the header file I notice this patch is not yet applied. I am
> > pretty sure I got an automated email from you regarding the merge
> > window, but nothing else so did this one slip the cracks?
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> As I am touching this in follow-up patch, can we just drop this one? I will
> be posting a couple of new patch assuming it is fine to drop this. Let me
> know how you want to handle this.

Just applied this, it's trivial and should be simple to merge around.

thanks,

greg k-h