linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Utilization estimation (util

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:25:06 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
        Steve Muckle <smuckle@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Utilization estimation (util_est) for FAIR tasks

On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 09:52:41AM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> Hi, here is an update of [1], based on today's tip/sched/core [2], which mainly
> adds some code cleanups suggested by Peter as well as fixes compilation for
> !CONFIG_SMP systems.
> 
> Most notably:
> a) The util_est's update flag has been renamed into UTIL_AVG_UNCHANGED, which
>    seems to better match its usages.
> b) The cpu_util_est() function has been removed to reduce cluttering by folding
>    its code directly into cpu_util(). This last function is thus now always
>    returning the estimated utilization of a CPU, unless this sched feature is
>    disabled.
> c) Not necessary READ_ONCE() have been removed from rq-lock protected code
>    paths. For util_est variable, that we read/modify/write only from rq-lock
>    protected, code we keep just the WRITE_ONCE() barriers, which are still
>    required for synchronization with lockless readers.
>    The READ_ONCE() have been instead maintained in all the getter functions,
>    like for example task_util() and cpu_util(), which can potentially be used
>    by lockless code. e.g. schedutil or load-balancer.
> 
> Results on both x86_64 and ARM (Android) targets, which have been collected and
> reported in previous postings [1,3], show negligible overheads, especially
> compared to the corresponding power/performance benefits on mobile platforms,
> where this feature helps to reduce the performance gap between PELT and another
> other out-of-tree load tracking solution.

Thanks Patrick!