linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, pkeys: do not special case protection key 0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f3de330c-e0b4-2210-1a93-f0fb6b5a5b3c@intel.com>
Date:   Sat, 17 Mar 2018 17:49:51 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mpe@...erman.id.au, mingo@...nel.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, pkeys: do not special case protection key 0

On 03/17/2018 04:24 PM, Ram Pai wrote:
> So the difference between the two proposals is just the freeing part i.e (b).
> Did I get this right?

Yeah, I think that's the only difference.