linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/10] dt-bindings: thermal: Remove "cooling-{min|max}-level" properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1521550190.2781.3.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Mar 2018 20:49:50 +0800
From:   Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] dt-bindings: thermal: Remove
 "cooling-{min|max}-level" properties

On 一, 2018-03-12 at 10:08 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 09-02-18, 14:28, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > 
> > The "cooling-min-level" and "cooling-max-level" properties are not
> > parsed by any part of kernel currently and the max cooling state of
> > a
> > CPU cooling device is found by referring to the cpufreq table
> > instead.
> > 
> > Remove the unused bindings.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt | 16 +----
> > -----------
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-)
> @Zhang/Eduardo: Can you please pick this patch (10/10) as almost
> everything else
> is already lined up for 4.17 ?

I think Eduardo should have reviewed all the DT thermal patches in the
list, but I didn't see his response about this one.

Eduardo,
did you miss this one?

thanks,
rui
>