lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 27 Mar 2018 14:26:58 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] ARM: dts: gemini: Remove "cooling-{min|max}-level"
 for gpio-fan node

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 4:10 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 9:58 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>> The "cooling-min-level" and "cooling-max-level" properties are not
>> parsed by any part of the kernel currently and the max cooling state of
>> gpio-fan cooling device is found by referring to the
>> "gpio-fan,speed-map" instead.
>>
>> Remove the unused properties from the gpio-fan node.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
>
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>
> I can queue it next week (different machine hosting the git tree)
> but it is also OK if the ARM SoC maintainers want to pick it
> directly for the ARM SoC DTS branch.

I've picked it up directly now, as we're about to run out of time
before the merge window.

       Arnd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ