[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e7e399f0-93d9-eef5-da7b-42df2d4417d8@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 20:04:22 +0800
From: Jia He <hejianet@...il.com>
To: Daniel Vacek <neelx@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@...fitbricks.com>,
Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>,
Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Kemi Wang <kemi.wang@...el.com>,
Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>,
YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@...il.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>,
Jia He <jia.he@...-semitech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm/memblock: introduce memblock_search_pfn_regions()
Hi Daniel
Thanks for the review
On 3/21/2018 6:14 PM, Daniel Vacek Wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:09 AM, Jia He <hejianet@...il.com> wrote:
>> This api is the preparation for further optimizing early_pfn_valid
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jia He <jia.he@...-semitech.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/memblock.h | 2 ++
>> mm/memblock.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
>> index 9471db4..5f46956 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
>> @@ -203,6 +203,8 @@ void __next_mem_pfn_range(int *idx, int nid, unsigned long *out_start_pfn,
>> i >= 0; __next_mem_pfn_range(&i, nid, p_start, p_end, p_nid))
>> #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP */
>>
>> +int memblock_search_pfn_regions(unsigned long pfn);
>> +
>> unsigned long memblock_next_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn, int *last_idx);
>> /**
>> * for_each_free_mem_range - iterate through free memblock areas
>> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
>> index a9e8da4..f50fe5b 100644
>> --- a/mm/memblock.c
>> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
>> @@ -1659,6 +1659,18 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_search(struct memblock_type *type, phys_addr
>> return -1;
>> }
>>
>> +/* search memblock with the input pfn, return the region idx */
>> +int __init_memblock memblock_search_pfn_regions(unsigned long pfn)
>> +{
>> + struct memblock_type *type = &memblock.memory;
>> + int mid = memblock_search(type, PFN_PHYS(pfn));
>> +
>> + if (mid == -1)
>> + return -1;
> Why this?
Yes, it is redudant and can be removed.
Thanks
Cheers,
Jia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists