[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3f208ebe-572f-f2f6-003e-5a9cf49bb92f@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 20:28:18 +0800
From: Jia He <hejianet@...il.com>
To: Daniel Vacek <neelx@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@...fitbricks.com>,
Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>,
Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Kemi Wang <kemi.wang@...el.com>,
Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>,
YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@...il.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>,
Jia He <jia.he@...-semitech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm: page_alloc: reduce unnecessary binary search in
memblock_next_valid_pfn()
On 3/21/2018 6:14 PM, Daniel Vacek Wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:09 AM, Jia He <hejianet@...il.com> wrote:
>> Commit b92df1de5d28 ("mm: page_alloc: skip over regions of invalid pfns
>> where possible") optimized the loop in memmap_init_zone(). But there is
>> still some room for improvement. E.g. if pfn and pfn+1 are in the same
>> memblock region, we can simply pfn++ instead of doing the binary search
>> in memblock_next_valid_pfn.
> There is a revert-mm-page_alloc-skip-over-regions-of-invalid-pfns-where-possible.patch
> in -mm reverting b92df1de5d289c0b as it is fundamentally wrong by
> design causing system panics on some machines with rare but still
> valid mappings. Basically it skips valid pfns which are outside of
> usable memory ranges (outside of memblock memory regions).
Thanks for the infomation.
quote from you patch description:
>But given some specific memory mapping on x86_64 (or more generally
theoretically anywhere but on arm with CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID) > the
implementation also skips valid pfns which is plain wrong and causes >
'kernel BUG at mm/page_alloc.c:1389!'
Do you think memblock_next_valid_pfn can remain to be not reverted on
arm64 with CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID? Arm64 can benifit from this
optimization.
Cheers,
Jia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists