lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ65rDy1UjJ7tEu4f3m8BwnA1qai1iRU3yWfU4qvEE9uLrr5pg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 24 Mar 2018 09:50:05 +0100
From:   Arend van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.16 2/3] drivers: change struct device_driver::coredump()
 return type to void

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 5:55 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:55:24AM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>> Upon submitting a patch for mwifiex [1] it was discussed whether this
>> callback function could fail. To keep things simple there is no need
>> for the error code so the driver can do the task synchronous or not
>> without worries. Currently the device driver core already ignores the
>> return value so changing it to void.
>>
>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10231933/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/device.h | 5 ++++-
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
>> index b093405..f08c25b 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/device.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/device.h
>> @@ -256,6 +256,9 @@ enum probe_type {
>>   *           automatically.
>>   * @pm:              Power management operations of the device which matched
>>   *           this driver.
>> + * @coredump:        Called when sysfs entry is written to. The device driver
>> + *           is expected to call the dev_coredump API resulting in a
>> + *           uevent.
>>   * @p:               Driver core's private data, no one other than the driver
>>   *           core can touch this.
>>   *
>> @@ -287,7 +290,7 @@ struct device_driver {
>>       const struct attribute_group **groups;
>>
>>       const struct dev_pm_ops *pm;
>> -     int (*coredump) (struct device *dev);
>> +     void (*coredump) (struct device *dev);
>
> Isn't this going to cause build warnings now?  Are there no users of
> this callback function yet?

Hi Greg,

I submitted driver patches for the 4.17 kernel and from that
discussion we concluded it would be good to change to void return
type. So those driver patches were dropped. The caller of the callback
in drivers/base/dd.c does not use the return value so from that side
there is no issue. So my motivation for asking to consider this for
4.16 is so I can resubmit the driver patches for 4.17 if there is
still time before the merge window.

Regards,
Arend

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ