linux-kernel - Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Mar 2018 08:37:14 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     陈华才 <chenhc@...ote.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
        Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        James Hogan <james.hogan@...s.com>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector

* 陈华才 <chenhc@...ote.com> [180326 06:59]:
> Hi, Tony and Fabio,
> 
> Could you please upload your kernel binary to somewhere for me? I don't understand why some ARM boards is OK while others are broken.

Well the kernel I'm testing is just current Linux next cross
compiled omap2plus_defconfig kernel. I do have few more config
options enabled like LOCKDEP and DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP, but I
doubt they matter here :)

Then I'm using gcc-7.3.0 and binutils-2.30 built with the
buildall.git scripts:

git://git.infradead.org/users/segher/buildall.git

If you still need binaries, let me know.

Do you know which arm devices are working with your patch?

Regards,

Tony