lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:57:17 +0800 From: "陈华才" <chenhc@...ote.com> To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Fabio Estevam" <festevam@...il.com> Cc: "Tony Lindgren" <tony@...mide.com>, "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, "Rich Felker" <dalias@...c.org>, "Russell King" <linux@....linux.org.uk>, "Yoshinori Sato" <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Ralf Baechle" <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, "linux-omap" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, "James Hogan" <james.hogan@...s.com>, "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org> Subject: Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector Hi, Tony and Fabio, Could you please upload your kernel binary to somewhere for me? I don't understand why some ARM boards is OK while others are broken. Huacai ------------------ Original ------------------ From: "Andrew Morton"<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>; Date: Sat, Mar 24, 2018 03:15 AM To: "Fabio Estevam"<festevam@...il.com>; Cc: "Tony Lindgren"<tony@...mide.com>; "Huacai Chen"<chenhc@...ote.com>; "Stephen Rothwell"<sfr@...b.auug.org.au>; "Rich Felker"<dalias@...c.org>; "Russell King"<linux@....linux.org.uk>; "Yoshinori Sato"<ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>; "linux-kernel"<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; "Ralf Baechle"<ralf@...ux-mips.org>; "linux-omap"<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>; "James Hogan"<james.hogan@...s.com>; "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>; Subject: Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 15:45:27 -0300 Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Looks like commit 5638790dadae ("zboot: fix stack protector in > > compressed boot phase") breaks booting on arm. > > Yes, almost all imx are broken in linux-next due to this commit: > https://kernelci.org/soc/imx/job/next/kernel/next-20180323/ Thanks, I dropped it and I expect Stephen will also do that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists