linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/11] Use global pages with PTI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1803271949250.1618@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Tue, 27 Mar 2018 19:51:07 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>, namit@...are.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Use global pages with PTI

On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, Dave Hansen wrote:

> On 03/27/2018 06:36 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>                         User Time       Kernel Time     Clock Elapsed
> >> Baseline ( 0 GLB PTEs)  803.79          67.77           237.30
> >> w/series (28 GLB PTEs)  807.70 (+0.7%)  68.07 (+0.7%)   238.07 (+0.3%)
> >>
> >> Without PCIDs, it behaves the way I would expect.
> > What's the performance benefit on !PCID systems? And I mean systems which
> > actually do not have PCID, not a PCID system with 'nopcid' on the command
> > line.
> 
> Do you have something in mind for this?  Basically *all* of the servers
> that I have access to have PCID because they are newer than ~7 years old.
> 
> That leaves *some* Ivybridge and earlier desktops, Atoms and AMD

AMD is not interesting as it's not PTI and uses GLOBAL anyway.

> systems.  Atoms are going to be the easiest thing to get my hands on,
> but I tend to shy away from them for performance work.

What I have in mind is that I wonder whether the whole circus is worth it
when there is no performance advantage on PCID systems.

Thanks,

	tglx