[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c0e7ca0b-dcb5-66e2-9df6-f53e4eb22781@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:32:27 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>, namit@...are.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Use global pages with PTI
On 03/27/2018 06:36 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> User Time Kernel Time Clock Elapsed
>> Baseline ( 0 GLB PTEs) 803.79 67.77 237.30
>> w/series (28 GLB PTEs) 807.70 (+0.7%) 68.07 (+0.7%) 238.07 (+0.3%)
>>
>> Without PCIDs, it behaves the way I would expect.
> What's the performance benefit on !PCID systems? And I mean systems which
> actually do not have PCID, not a PCID system with 'nopcid' on the command
> line.
Do you have something in mind for this? Basically *all* of the servers
that I have access to have PCID because they are newer than ~7 years old.
That leaves *some* Ivybridge and earlier desktops, Atoms and AMD
systems. Atoms are going to be the easiest thing to get my hands on,
but I tend to shy away from them for performance work.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists