[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180327192410.nvu6s4ekctuuybnn@latitude>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 21:24:10 +0200
From: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] powerpc/mm/32: Use page_is_ram to check for RAM
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:19:32PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> writes:
> > Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net> writes:
[...]
> >> - if (slab_is_available() && (p < virt_to_phys(high_memory)) &&
> >> + if (page_is_ram(__phys_to_pfn(p)) &&
> >> !(__allow_ioremap_reserved && memblock_is_region_reserved(p, size))) {
> >> printk("__ioremap(): phys addr 0x%llx is RAM lr %ps\n",
> >> (unsigned long long)p, __builtin_return_address(0));
> >
> >
> > This is killing my p5020ds (Freescale e5500) unfortunately:
>
> Duh, I should actually read the patch :)
>
> This is a 32-bit system with 4G of RAM, so not all of RAM is mapped,
> some of it is highem which is why removing the test against high_memory
> above breaks it.
>
> So I need the high_memory test on this system.
This is an oversight on my part. I thought I wouldn't need this test
because the memblock-based test is more accurate, but I didn't think
through how high memory actually works.
> I'm not clear why it was a problem for you on the Wii, do you even build
> the Wii kernel with HIGHMEM enabled?
No. The Wii works fine with the p < virt_to_phys(high_memory) test, and
doesn't use CONFIG_HIGHMEM. I'll send a version two of this patchset.
Thanks for testing,
Jonathan Neuschäfer
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists