[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180327192540.GA2293@embeddedgus>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 14:25:40 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH] watchdog: sch311x_wdt: Mark expected switch fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case I replaced "Fall" with a proper
"Fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
drivers/watchdog/sch311x_wdt.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sch311x_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/sch311x_wdt.c
index 43d0cbb..814cdf5 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/sch311x_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/sch311x_wdt.c
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static long sch311x_wdt_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
if (sch311x_wdt_set_heartbeat(new_timeout))
return -EINVAL;
sch311x_wdt_keepalive();
- /* Fall */
+ /* Fall through */
case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
return put_user(timeout, p);
default:
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists