[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180327193041.GA2432@embeddedgus>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 14:30:41 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH] watchdog: w83977f_wdt: Mark expected switch fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case I replaced "Fall" with a proper
"Fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
drivers/watchdog/w83977f_wdt.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/w83977f_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/w83977f_wdt.c
index 20e2bba..672b61a 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/w83977f_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/w83977f_wdt.c
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ static long wdt_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
return -EINVAL;
wdt_keepalive();
- /* Fall */
+ /* Fall through */
case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
return put_user(timeout, uarg.i);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists