linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <63851bce-65c2-76a2-8b75-bc268a998457@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:48:21 -0700
From:   David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     lgirdwood@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rnayak@...eaurora.org,
        sboyd@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator
 bindings

Hello Mark,

On 03/20/2018 07:43 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 06:09:11PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
>> Introduce bindings for RPMh regulator devices found on some
>> Qualcomm Technlogies, Inc. SoCs.  These devices allow a given
> 
> Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem.  This
> makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.

Looking through the DT binding patches sent to devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
it seemed like the preferred style is:
[PATCH] dt-bindings: subsystem: ...

I can change the subject line for this patch to be:
"[PATCH 2/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings"
if you prefer.


>> +=========================================
>> +Second Level Nodes - Regulators
>> +=========================================
>> +
>> +- regulator-name
> 
> This document appears to be reproducing the standard regulator bindings;
> there is no need to do that, just reference them.

Sure, I'll remove this.

Thanks,
David

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project