[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180328020845.GB29099@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 10:08:45 +0800
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>, sboyd@...nel.org,
ilina@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 04:38:07PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
> On 03/27/2018 04:56 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I didn't spot this in the code but something called "device tree mode"
> > sounds like it's going to be awfully confusing...
> As I explained in the earlier email, it makes the device tree
> configurations much simpler and less confusing/error prone. I'd like to
> keep this concept around unless their are strong objections.
Like I say I didn't spot this in the code, I did give it a brief once
over but as Doug had spotted such extensive problems I was expecting a
resend. It *is* setting off big alarm bells though, in general if your
individual driver is doing something weird to make life easier that's a
sign that it's doing things at the wrong level.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists