linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ALSA: aloop: Mark paused device as inactive

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a142f77d-cc4a-c934-574f-4b1e82ea54b8@axis.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:41:44 +0200
From:   Robert Rosengren <robert.rosengren@...s.com>
To:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
CC:     <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: aloop: Mark paused device as inactive

On 03/26/2018 04:43 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 07:24:49 +0200,
> Robert Rosengren wrote:
>>
>> Show paused ALSA aloop device as inactive, i.e. the control
>> "PCM Slave Active" set as false. Notification sent upon state change.
>>
>> This makes it possible for client capturing from aloop device to know if
>> data is expected. Without it the client expects data even if playback
>> is paused.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Rosengren <robertr@...s.com>
> 
> The code change looks good, but just to be sure:
> you've submitted from the address robert.rosengren@...s.com that is
> different from the sign-off robertr@...s.com.  Is this intentional?
> The former is recorded as the author in git history.
> 
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Takashi
> 

Sorry for the confusion. It is not intentional to use different though both are valid, apparently I have used the longer one in earlier patches to kernel so please change:
Signed-off-by: Robert Rosengren <robert.rosengren@...s.com>

Thanks for letting me know!
Robert