[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5htvt283bs.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 08:01:11 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Robert Rosengren <robert.rosengren@...s.com>
Cc: <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: aloop: Mark paused device as inactive
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:41:44 +0200,
Robert Rosengren wrote:
>
> On 03/26/2018 04:43 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 07:24:49 +0200,
> > Robert Rosengren wrote:
> >>
> >> Show paused ALSA aloop device as inactive, i.e. the control
> >> "PCM Slave Active" set as false. Notification sent upon state change.
> >>
> >> This makes it possible for client capturing from aloop device to know if
> >> data is expected. Without it the client expects data even if playback
> >> is paused.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Robert Rosengren <robertr@...s.com>
> >
> > The code change looks good, but just to be sure:
> > you've submitted from the address robert.rosengren@...s.com that is
> > different from the sign-off robertr@...s.com. Is this intentional?
> > The former is recorded as the author in git history.
> >
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Takashi
> >
>
> Sorry for the confusion. It is not intentional to use different though both are valid, apparently I have used the longer one in earlier patches to kernel so please change:
> Signed-off-by: Robert Rosengren <robert.rosengren@...s.com>
OK, applied now. Thanks.
Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists