[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180327055859.s2tjsvgdwd7cdkf7@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 07:58:59 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] perf version: Print the status of compiled-in
libraries
* Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> +#ifdef HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef HAVE_DWARF_GETLOCATIONS
> +#ifdef NO_GLIBC
> +#ifdef HAVE_GTK2_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBAUDIT_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBBFD_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBELF_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBNUMA_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef NO_LIBPERL
> +#ifdef NO_LIBPYTHON
> +#ifdef HAVE_SLANG_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBCRYPTO_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBUNWIND_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef HAVE_DWARF_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef HAVE_ZLIB_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef HAVE_LZMA_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef HAVE_AUXTRACE_SUPPORT
> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
BTW., it would be nice at this point to fix those 3 outliers that have a negation
in their library support status macro:
> +#ifdef NO_GLIBC
> +#ifdef NO_LIBPERL
> +#ifdef NO_LIBPYTHON
... and invert them back to the HAVE_* side of the logic:
> +#ifdef HAVE_GLIBC
> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBPERL
> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBPYTHON
That should make all related code more consistent and more readable.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists