[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1803280310380.68839@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 03:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
peterz@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
kirill@...temov.name, ak@...ux.intel.com, mhocko@...nel.org,
dave@...olabs.net, jack@...e.cz,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
mpe@...erman.id.au, paulus@...ba.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, hpa@...or.com,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
kemi.wang@...el.com, sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
haren@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
npiggin@...il.com, bsingharora@...il.com,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 01/24] mm: Introduce CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT
On Wed, 28 Mar 2018, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> >> This configuration variable will be used to build the code needed to
> >> handle speculative page fault.
> >>
> >> By default it is turned off, and activated depending on architecture
> >> support.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> >> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >> mm/Kconfig | 3 +++
> >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
> >> index abefa573bcd8..07c566c88faf 100644
> >> --- a/mm/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> >> @@ -759,3 +759,6 @@ config GUP_BENCHMARK
> >> performance of get_user_pages_fast().
> >>
> >> See tools/testing/selftests/vm/gup_benchmark.c
> >> +
> >> +config SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT
> >> + bool
> >
> > Should this be configurable even if the arch supports it?
>
> Actually, this is not configurable unless by manually editing the .config file.
>
> I made it this way on the Thomas's request :
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/1/15/969
>
> That sounds to be the smarter way to achieve that, isn't it ?
>
Putting this in mm/Kconfig is definitely the right way to go about it
instead of any generic option in arch/*.
My question, though, was making this configurable by the user:
config SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT
bool "Speculative page faults"
depends on X86_64 || PPC
default y
help
..
It's a question about whether we want this always enabled on x86_64 and
power or whether the user should be able to disable it (right now they
can't). With a large feature like this, you may want to offer something
simple (disable CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT) if someone runs into
regressions.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists