linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.15 000/105] 4.15.14-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 28 Mar 2018 12:06:08 -0700
From:   Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        shuahkh@....samsung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.15 000/105] 4.15.14-stable review

On 03/28/2018 11:44 AM, Dan Rue wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 06:26:40PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.15.14 release.
>> There are 105 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Thu Mar 29 16:27:29 UTC 2018.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64 and x86_64.
> 
> There is a regression on arm32 in libhugetlbfs/truncate_above_4GB-2M-32
> that also exists in 4.14 and mainline. We'll investigate the root cause
> and report upstream in mainline. I suspect the cause is "hugetlbfs:
> check for pgoff value overflow", but have not verified yet.

I'll also take a look as this was a patch I introduced.  

-- 
Mike Kravetz