linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nvme-multipath: implement active-active round-robin path selector

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 28 Mar 2018 13:47:41 -0600
From:   Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Baegjae Sung <baegjae@...il.com>, axboe@...com, sagi@...mberg.me,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-multipath: implement active-active round-robin path
 selector

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:06:46AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> For PCIe devices the right policy is not a round robin but to use
> the pcie device closer to the node.  I did a prototype for that
> long ago and the concept can work.  Can you look into that and
> also make that policy used automatically for PCIe devices?

Yeah, that is especially true if you've multiple storage accessing
threads scheduled on different nodes. On the other hand, round-robin
may still benefit if both paths are connected to different root ports
on the same node (who would do that?!).

But I wasn't aware people use dual-ported PCIe NVMe connected to a
single host (single path from two hosts seems more common). If that's a
thing, we should get some numa awareness. I couldn't find your prototype,
though. I had one stashed locally from a while back and hope it resembles
what you had in mind:
---
struct nvme_ns *nvme_find_path_numa(struct nvme_ns_head *head)
{
        int distance, current = INT_MAX, node = cpu_to_node(smp_processor_id());
        struct nvme_ns *ns, *path = NULL;

        list_for_each_entry_rcu(ns, &head->list, siblings) {
                if (ns->ctrl->state != NVME_CTRL_LIVE)
                        continue;
                if (ns->disk->node_id == node)
                        return ns;

                distance = node_distance(node, ns->disk->node_id);
                if (distance < current) {
                        current = distance;
                        path = ns;
                }
        }
        return path;
}
--