lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 29 Mar 2018 10:56:21 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Baegjae Sung <baegjae@...il.com>,
        axboe@...com, sagi@...mberg.me, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-multipath: implement active-active round-robin
        path selector

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 01:47:41PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> single host (single path from two hosts seems more common). If that's a
> thing, we should get some numa awareness. I couldn't find your prototype,
> though. I had one stashed locally from a while back and hope it resembles
> what you had in mind:

Mine was way older before the current data structures.  Back then I
used ->map_queues hacks that I'm glad I never posted :)

> ---
> struct nvme_ns *nvme_find_path_numa(struct nvme_ns_head *head)
> {
>         int distance, current = INT_MAX, node = cpu_to_node(smp_processor_id());
>         struct nvme_ns *ns, *path = NULL;
> 
>         list_for_each_entry_rcu(ns, &head->list, siblings) {
>                 if (ns->ctrl->state != NVME_CTRL_LIVE)
>                         continue;
>                 if (ns->disk->node_id == node)
>                         return ns;
> 
>                 distance = node_distance(node, ns->disk->node_id);
>                 if (distance < current) {
>                         current = distance;
>                         path = ns;
>                 }
>         }
>         return path;

This is roughly what I'd do now.  The other important change would
be to have a per-node cache of the current path so that we don't do
it in the hot path.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ