[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180331101914.ylrlgxhdohcosbnr@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 12:19:14 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: hpa@...or.com, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lkp@...el.com, sohil.mehta@...el.com, mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/io: Define readq()/writeq() to use 64-bit
type
* Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 08:58 -0800, tip-bot for Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Commit-ID: 0fc8483b698620ea3d8cc6635b54eccc613c23a3
> > Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/0fc8483b698620ea3d8cc6635b54ecc
> > c613c23a3
> > Author: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > AuthorDate: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 16:33:22 +0200
> > Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > CommitDate: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 17:14:41 +0100
>
> As of today I don't see this in linux-next
>
> % git tag --contains 0fc8483b69862
> next-20180214
> next-20180215
> next-20180216
>
> What happened to this change?
Hm, so it's a real mystery: I merged it, then removed it 1.5 days later without
reporting anything. According to the Git log timestamp the removal happened late
at night, so maybe it was a tired typo?
Anyway, it's a good thing you kept out an eye for this: I re-applied the patch for
v4.17 and will let you know if there's any problem in testing.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists