[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180401155444.7006-1-sf@sfritsch.de>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2018 17:54:44 +0200
From: Stefan Fritsch <sf@...itsch.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Stefan Fritsch <sf@...itsch.de>
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: Add emulation for movups/movupd
This is very similar to the aligned versions movaps/movapd.
We have seen the corresponding emulation failures with openbsd as guest
and with Windows 10 with intel HD graphics pass through.
Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian_ehrhardt@...ua.de>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Fritsch <sf@...itsch.de>
---
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index d91eaeb01034..7dda8e38c19a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -4498,6 +4498,10 @@ static const struct gprefix pfx_0f_2b = {
ID(0, &instr_dual_0f_2b), ID(0, &instr_dual_0f_2b), N, N,
};
+static const struct gprefix pfx_0f_10_0f_11 = {
+ I(Unaligned, em_mov), I(Unaligned, em_mov), N, N,
+};
+
static const struct gprefix pfx_0f_28_0f_29 = {
I(Aligned, em_mov), I(Aligned, em_mov), N, N,
};
@@ -4709,7 +4713,9 @@ static const struct opcode twobyte_table[256] = {
DI(ImplicitOps | Priv, invd), DI(ImplicitOps | Priv, wbinvd), N, N,
N, D(ImplicitOps | ModRM | SrcMem | NoAccess), N, N,
/* 0x10 - 0x1F */
- N, N, N, N, N, N, N, N,
+ GP(ModRM | DstReg | SrcMem | Mov | Sse, &pfx_0f_10_0f_11),
+ GP(ModRM | DstMem | SrcReg | Mov | Sse, &pfx_0f_10_0f_11),
+ N, N, N, N, N, N,
D(ImplicitOps | ModRM | SrcMem | NoAccess),
N, N, N, N, N, N, D(ImplicitOps | ModRM | SrcMem | NoAccess),
/* 0x20 - 0x2F */
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists