[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8d578e49-c1a0-a38d-3b91-f0a07de0089b@themaw.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2018 10:01:41 +0800
From: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
To: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>
Cc: autofs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] autofs4: use wake_up() instead of wake_up_interruptible
On 01/04/18 09:31, Ian Kent wrote:
> On 31/03/18 10:28, Andrei Vagin wrote:
>> In "autofs4: use wait_event_killable", wait_event_interruptible() was
>> replaced by wait_event_killable(), but in this case we have to use
>> wake_up() instead of wake_up_interruptible().
>
> Why do you believe wake_up() is needed rather than wake_up_interruptible()?
>
> Now that I'm thinking about the wake up I'm wondering if this is in fact
> what's needed. Rather, I think maybe wake_up_all() is probably the only
> one that will actually do what's needed.
Ok, so that 1 is the number of exclusive waiters.
So what is the difference between the two wake_up calls in this case?
>
> There's an individual wait queue for each mount, there can be multiple
> waiters for a mount, they all should be woken up when the daemon signals
> mount completion.
>
>>
>> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>
>> Cc: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>
>> ---
>> fs/autofs4/waitq.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/autofs4/waitq.c b/fs/autofs4/waitq.c
>> index c160e9b3aa0f..be9c3dc048ab 100644
>> --- a/fs/autofs4/waitq.c
>> +++ b/fs/autofs4/waitq.c
>> @@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ int autofs4_wait_release(struct autofs_sb_info *sbi, autofs_wqt_t wait_queue_tok
>> kfree(wq->name.name);
>> wq->name.name = NULL; /* Do not wait on this queue */
>> wq->status = status;
>> - wake_up_interruptible(&wq->queue);
>> + wake_up(&wq->queue);
>> if (!--wq->wait_ctr)
>> kfree(wq);
>> mutex_unlock(&sbi->wq_mutex);
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists