[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87po3i1dhu.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 13:41:33 +1000
From: NeilBrown <neil@...wn.name>
To: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
Cc: Chris Coffey <cmc@...blebit.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: mt7621-eth: Fix sparse warning in ethtool.c
On Mon, Apr 02 2018, Sean Wang wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-04-02 at 09:34 +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 29 2018, Chris Coffey wrote:
>>
>> > This fixes the following sparse warning:
>> >
>> > drivers/staging/mt7621-eth/ethtool.c:213:6: warning: symbol
>> > 'mtk_set_ethtool_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Chris Coffey <cmc@...blebit.net>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neil@...wn.name>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> NeilBrown
>>
> Hi, Neil
>
> Forgive me I cannot find the cover letter in the original series in my
> mailbox to make a reply, so I rudely made here just letting you know
> something good to the growth of mt7621 support in upstream.
>
> do you have maintained an out-of-tree branch to boot the mt7621 machine
> with those staging patches?
I can boot v4.16 plus staging-next on my mt7621 with no other patches.
An important fix (a63d706ea71919) landed in 4.16-rc7.
It do have
https://github.com/neilbrown/linux/commits/gnubee/v4.15
which was part of preparation for this, but now that very nearly all I
need is in mainline or on its way, I won't be doing much more in that
tree.
>
> If so, it would become a bit easier for me that maybe I could give a
> hand for migrating these staging driver for mt7621 to mainline. I
> thought mmc, pci, ethernet, gsw and hsdma all could probably reuse the
> current mainline code.
I agree that it is quite likely that several of these drivers could and
should reuse current mainline code. I would love to have some help
sorting this out. I won't have much time myself to dig into it for
several weeks, but I'll make time to review and test any code that is
contributed.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists