lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 4 Apr 2018 23:02:58 +0100
From:   James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
Cc:     matt.redfearn@...s.com, antonynpavlov@...il.com,
        ralf@...ux-mips.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, mcgrof@...nel.org,
        robin.murphy@....com, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, clm@...com,
        ynorov@...iumnetworks.com, jk@...abs.org, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bart.vanassche@....com, robh@...nel.org,
        terrelln@...com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, albert@...ive.com,
        viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, tom@...ntonium.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, richard@....at,
        paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] lib: Rename compiler intrinsic selects to
 GENERIC_LIB_*

On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 03:39:34PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> Sorry, I'm not sure if this is the right patch -- someone suggested acking 
> this, but it's already Review-By me and if I understand correctly it's going 
> through your tree.  I'm a bit new to this, but if it helps then here's a
> 
> Acked-By: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>

Thanks Palmer.

No worries. FYI Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst appears to
now contain lots of gory detail about what Acked-by and Reviewed-by are
supposed to mean.

In this case an acked-by is needed to show your approval of the parts of
the patch which touch the subsystem you are responsible for (and/or code
which you have authored) so that the patch can go via another tree. It
usually indicates that you've reviewed those parts of the patch too, but
not necessarily the whole thing.

Cheers
James

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ