lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 04 Apr 2018 17:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
To:     jhogan@...nel.org
CC:     matt.redfearn@...s.com, antonynpavlov@...il.com,
        ralf@...ux-mips.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, mcgrof@...nel.org,
        robin.murphy@....com, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, clm@...com,
        ynorov@...iumnetworks.com, jk@...abs.org, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bart.vanassche@....com, robh@...nel.org,
        terrelln@...com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, albert@...ive.com,
        viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, tom@...ntonium.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, richard@....at,
        paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject:     Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] lib: Rename compiler intrinsic selects to GENERIC_LIB_*

On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 15:02:58 PDT (-0700), jhogan@...nel.org wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 03:39:34PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> Sorry, I'm not sure if this is the right patch -- someone suggested acking 
>> this, but it's already Review-By me and if I understand correctly it's going 
>> through your tree.  I'm a bit new to this, but if it helps then here's a
>> 
>> Acked-By: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
>
> Thanks Palmer.
>
> No worries. FYI Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst appears to
> now contain lots of gory detail about what Acked-by and Reviewed-by are
> supposed to mean.
>
> In this case an acked-by is needed to show your approval of the parts of
> the patch which touch the subsystem you are responsible for (and/or code
> which you have authored) so that the patch can go via another tree. It
> usually indicates that you've reviewed those parts of the patch too, but
> not necessarily the whole thing.

Thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists