linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 3/9] pinctrl: actions: Add Actions S900 pinctrl driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 6 Apr 2018 17:01:07 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
        刘炜 <liuwei@...ions-semi.com>,
        mp-cs@...ions-semi.com, 96boards@...obotics.com,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        amit.kucheria@...aro.org,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        hzhang@...obotics.com, bdong@...obotics.com,
        Mani Sadhasivam <manivannanece23@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/9] pinctrl: actions: Add Actions S900 pinctrl driver

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 8:00 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam
<manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org> wrote:

>> > +static const struct pinconf_ops owl_pinconf_ops = {
>> > +       .is_generic = true,
>> > +       .pin_config_get = owl_pin_config_get,
>> > +       .pin_config_set = owl_pin_config_set,
>> > +       .pin_config_group_get = owl_group_config_get,
>> > +       .pin_config_group_set = owl_group_config_set
>>
>> It's still good idea to leave comma here...

> I'm confused. What is the criteria for removing/keeping comma for last member
> of struct? I followed your gpio driver suggestion.

Just a common sense and experience are talking here: from time to time
some structures are being expanded and in some cases it requires to
update users. The comma just reduces a possible burden on this
expansion.
This is common pattern used in kernel.

>> > +};
>> > +
>> > +static struct pinctrl_desc owl_pinctrl_desc = {
>> > +       .pctlops = &owl_pinctrl_ops,
>> > +       .pmxops = &owl_pinmux_ops,
>> > +       .confops = &owl_pinconf_ops,
>> > +       .owner = THIS_MODULE
>>
>> ...and here, and in all similar places.
>>
>> > +};

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko