linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.4 065/162] tcp: Add a tcp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMOXUJkEomBfpBLbfaZTG9SyGGAvtG_zoA3CfMtxW4BUOSX6sg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Apr 2018 11:00:06 -0700
From:   Chenbo Feng <fengc@...gle.com>
To:     Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>
Cc:     "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.4 065/162] tcp: Add a tcp_filter hook before
 handle ack packet

On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 5:28 PM, Sasha Levin
<Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com> wrote:
> From: Chenbo Feng <fengc@...gle.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit 8fac365f63c866a00015fa13932d8ffc584518b8 ]
>
> Currently in both ipv4 and ipv6 code path, the ack packet received when
> sk at TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV state is not filtered by socket filter or cgroup
> filter since it is handled from tcp_child_process and never reaches the
> tcp_filter inside tcp_v4_rcv or tcp_v6_rcv. Adding a tcp_filter hooks
> here can make sure all the ingress tcp packet can be correctly filtered.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chenbo Feng <fengc@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
> ---
>  net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 2 ++
>  net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> index 61c93a93f228..2eb9a1747f25 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> @@ -1639,6 +1639,8 @@ process:
>                 }
>                 if (nsk == sk) {
>                         reqsk_put(req);
> +               } else if (tcp_filter(sk, skb)) {
> +                       goto discard_and_relse;
>                 } else if (tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb)) {
>                         tcp_v4_send_reset(nsk, skb);
>                         goto discard_and_relse;
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
> index 74cbcc4b399c..7d7f0999a919 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
> @@ -1428,6 +1428,8 @@ process:
>                 if (nsk == sk) {
>                         reqsk_put(req);
>                         tcp_v6_restore_cb(skb);
> +               } else if (tcp_filter(sk, skb)) {
> +                       goto discard_and_relse;
>                 } else if (tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb)) {
>                         tcp_v6_send_reset(nsk, skb);
>                         goto discard_and_relse;
> --
> 2.15.1
There is a bug fix for this patch upstream:
"d624d276d1ddacbcb12ad96832ce0c7b82cd25db tcp: fix possible deadlock
in TCP stack vs BPF filter", Please make you include that as well if
you want to add this patch to stable.