lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180415150141.GS2341@sasha-vm>
Date:   Sun, 15 Apr 2018 15:01:43 +0000
From:   Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>
To:     Chenbo Feng <fengc@...gle.com>
CC:     "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.4 065/162] tcp: Add a tcp_filter hook before
 handle ack packet

On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 11:00:06AM -0700, Chenbo Feng wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 5:28 PM, Sasha Levin
><Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com> wrote:
>> From: Chenbo Feng <fengc@...gle.com>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit 8fac365f63c866a00015fa13932d8ffc584518b8 ]
>>
>> Currently in both ipv4 and ipv6 code path, the ack packet received when
>> sk at TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV state is not filtered by socket filter or cgroup
>> filter since it is handled from tcp_child_process and never reaches the
>> tcp_filter inside tcp_v4_rcv or tcp_v6_rcv. Adding a tcp_filter hooks
>> here can make sure all the ingress tcp packet can be correctly filtered.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chenbo Feng <fengc@...gle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
>> ---
>>  net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 2 ++
>>  net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 2 ++
>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
>> index 61c93a93f228..2eb9a1747f25 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
>> @@ -1639,6 +1639,8 @@ process:
>>                 }
>>                 if (nsk == sk) {
>>                         reqsk_put(req);
>> +               } else if (tcp_filter(sk, skb)) {
>> +                       goto discard_and_relse;
>>                 } else if (tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb)) {
>>                         tcp_v4_send_reset(nsk, skb);
>>                         goto discard_and_relse;
>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
>> index 74cbcc4b399c..7d7f0999a919 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
>> @@ -1428,6 +1428,8 @@ process:
>>                 if (nsk == sk) {
>>                         reqsk_put(req);
>>                         tcp_v6_restore_cb(skb);
>> +               } else if (tcp_filter(sk, skb)) {
>> +                       goto discard_and_relse;
>>                 } else if (tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb)) {
>>                         tcp_v6_send_reset(nsk, skb);
>>                         goto discard_and_relse;
>> --
>> 2.15.1
>There is a bug fix for this patch upstream:
>"d624d276d1ddacbcb12ad96832ce0c7b82cd25db tcp: fix possible deadlock
>in TCP stack vs BPF filter", Please make you include that as well if
>you want to add this patch to stable.

That commit had quite a few conflicts, so I dropped this commit instead.
Thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ