[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180410142252.crnlqkia2pmucbum@mwanda>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 17:22:53 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode/AMD: fix read of uninitialized data
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:41:23PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> Currently function __load_ucode_amd can assign an uninitialized cp to *ret
> if get_builtin_microcode returns false.
What are you looking at? Here is how it looks in linux-next:
270
271 if (!get_builtin_microcode(&cp, x86_family(cpuid_1_eax)))
272 cp = find_microcode_in_initrd(path, use_pa);
273
If get_builtin_microcode() returns false, then cp is initialized on the
next line.
Maybe the issue is that cp.name is uninitialized. It doesn't cause an
issue but it would be understandable for a static checker to warn about
it when we do "*ret = cp;".
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists