lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180410142252.crnlqkia2pmucbum@mwanda>
Date:   Tue, 10 Apr 2018 17:22:53 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode/AMD: fix read of uninitialized data

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:41:23PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> Currently function __load_ucode_amd can assign an uninitialized cp to *ret
> if get_builtin_microcode returns false.

What are you looking at?  Here is how it looks in linux-next:

   270  
   271          if (!get_builtin_microcode(&cp, x86_family(cpuid_1_eax)))
   272                  cp = find_microcode_in_initrd(path, use_pa);
   273  


If get_builtin_microcode() returns false, then cp is initialized on the
next line.

Maybe the issue is that cp.name is uninitialized.  It doesn't cause an
issue but it would be understandable for a static checker to warn about
it when we do "*ret = cp;".

regards,
dan carpenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ