linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sparc: compat: allow including asm/compat.h for 32-bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87fu41ilor.fsf@xmission.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Apr 2018 14:32:04 -0500
From:   ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
        y2038@...ts.linaro.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc: compat: allow including asm/compat.h for 32-bit

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes:

> We have several files on sparc that include linux/compat.h and expect
> asm/compat.h not to be included, otherwise we get a build failure.

Should this say: "We have several files on sparc that include
linux/compat.h and expect asm/compat.h not be included when
!CONFIG_COMPAT." ?

I don't have your tree and I see asm/compat.h included from
linux/compat.h already so the description above seems wrong.

Eric