[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5bd1bb46-8f71-e6db-7fb7-43d023a37f58@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 10:41:23 +0200
From: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mpe@...erman.id.au, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <albert@...ive.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: remove odd HAVE_PTE_SPECIAL
On 11/04/2018 10:33, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 11-04-18 10:03:36, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>> @@ -881,7 +876,8 @@ struct page *_vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
>>
>> if (is_zero_pfn(pfn))
>> return NULL;
>> -check_pfn:
>> +
>> +check_pfn: __maybe_unused
>> if (unlikely(pfn > highest_memmap_pfn)) {
>> print_bad_pte(vma, addr, pte, NULL);
>> return NULL;
>> @@ -891,7 +887,7 @@ struct page *_vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
>> * NOTE! We still have PageReserved() pages in the page tables.
>> * eg. VDSO mappings can cause them to exist.
>> */
>> -out:
>> +out: __maybe_unused
>> return pfn_to_page(pfn);
>
> Why do we need this ugliness all of the sudden?
Indeed the compiler doesn't complaint but in theory it should since these
labels are not used depending on CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists