[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1523436087-4485-1-git-send-email-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:41:27 +0800
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, frankt@...mise.com, andre@...ux-ide.org,
sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2 v2] ide: pdc202xx_new: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in detect_pll_input_clock
detect_pll_input_clock() is never called in atomic context.
detect_pll_input_clock() is only called by init_chipset_pdcnew(), which
is set as ".init_chipset" in struct ide_port_info.
This function is not called in atomic context.
Despite never getting called from atomic context, detect_pll_input_clock()
calls mdelay() to busily wait.
This is not necessary and can be replaced with usleep_range() to
avoid busy waiting.
This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
And I also manually check it.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
---
v2:
* Correct wrong usage of usleep_range() in v1.
Thank Sergei for pointing it out.
---
drivers/ide/pdc202xx_new.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ide/pdc202xx_new.c b/drivers/ide/pdc202xx_new.c
index b33646b..6afa66d 100644
--- a/drivers/ide/pdc202xx_new.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/pdc202xx_new.c
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static long detect_pll_input_clock(unsigned long dma_base)
outb(scr1 | 0x40, dma_base + 0x03);
/* Let the counter run for 10 ms. */
- mdelay(10);
+ usleep_range(10000, 11000);
end_count = read_counter(dma_base);
end_time = ktime_get();
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists