[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180411095218.zth5edjth2cxrrwc@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 11:52:18 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
"Tobin C . Harding" <me@...in.cc>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] vsprintf: Consolidate handling of unknown pointer
specifiers
On Tue 2018-04-10 14:41:55, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 15:50 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Sat 2018-04-07 17:26:40, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 10:58 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
>
> > > This change collides with my patch series. Can you elaborate what
> > > your
> > > thoughts are about my patches? Are you going incorporate them to
> > > your
> > > series? Should I send them independently?
> >
> > Good question. I think that the best solution will be that I go
> > over your patchset and just add all valid ones into printk.git
> > for-4.18.
>
> I think about 1-7 and 9 that can go as is before your changes.
> And patch 8 postpone
Done. All the 8 patches are in printk.git, branch
for-4.18-vsprintf-cleanup.
I am sorry that we have missed 4.17. In theory, it still might be
possible to push them there. But there does not seem to be a real
reason to rush them.
> > Then I will base v5 of this patchset on top of it.
>
> I'm going for vacation tomorrow. Can you just take them into your series
> or apply to your tree?
Good to know.
Enjoy vacation,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists