[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180412141639.GV5700@atomide.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 07:16:39 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, grygorii.strashko@...com,
t-kristo@...com, Russ.Dill@...com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ssantosh@...nel.org,
haojian.zhuang@...aro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
d-gerlach@...com, Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] ARM: OMAP2: Add functions to save and restore
pinctrl context.
Hi,
* Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com> [180412 03:56]:
> From: Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@...il.com>
>
> This adds a pair of context save/restore functions to save/restore the
> state of a set of pinctrl registers. This simplifies some of the AM33XX
> PM code as some of the pinctrl registers are lost when the per power
> domain loses power. The pincrtl code can perform the necessary
> save/restore.
So where's the patch adding callers to this code?
If this cannot be done from regular driver suspend/resume calls,
this probably should be done from cpu_pm notifiers CPU_PM_ENTER and
CPU_PM_EXIT. We should also do the same for GPIO BTW.
BTW, the subject line is wrong here, it should be "pinctrl" :)
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists