[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e48ed216-f524-5b81-9790-33ccb78f7c06@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 10:16:55 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org, boqun.feng@...il.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/13] locking/qspinlock: Remove unbounded cmpxchg loop
from locking slowpath
On 04/12/2018 10:06 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:53:16PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>>> diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
>>> index 396701e8c62d..a8fc402b3f3a 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
>>> @@ -162,6 +162,17 @@ struct __qspinlock {
>>>
>>> #if _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8
>>> /**
>>> + * clear_pending - clear the pending bit.
>>> + * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
>>> + *
>>> + * *,1,* -> *,0,*
>>> + */
>>> +static __always_inline void clear_pending(struct qspinlock *lock)
>>> +{
>>> + WRITE_ONCE(lock->pending, 0);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> * clear_pending_set_locked - take ownership and clear the pending bit.
>>> * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
>>> *
>>> @@ -201,6 +212,17 @@ static __always_inline u32 xchg_tail(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 tail)
>>> #else /* _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8 */
>>>
>>> /**
>>> + * clear_pending - clear the pending bit.
>>> + * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
>>> + *
>>> + * *,1,* -> *,0,*
>>> + */
>>> +static __always_inline void clear_pending(struct qspinlock *lock)
>>> +{
>>> + atomic_andnot(_Q_PENDING_VAL, &lock->val);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> * clear_pending_set_locked - take ownership and clear the pending bit.
>>> * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
>>> *
>> BTW, there is a similar clear_pending() function in
>> qspinlock_paravirt.c. I think you need to remove that with this patch.
> Thanks, I'll do that. I did build and bisect this series... for arm64, which
> is completely useless as it doesn't get compiled until the final patch which
> I haven't posted here.
>
> Will
You certainly need to get a x86 system and compiles with the patches
applied one-by-one with CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS enabled.
Cheers,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists