[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180412215855.GB27802@saruman>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 22:58:55 +0100
From: James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, arnd@...db.de, timur@...eaurora.org,
sulrich@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] MIPS: io: add a barrier after register read in
readX()
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:51:49PM +0100, James Hogan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 08:55:04AM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > While a barrier is present in writeX() function before the register write,
> > a similar barrier is missing in the readX() function after the register
> > read. This could allow memory accesses following readX() to observe
> > stale data.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
> > Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> Both patches look like obvious improvements to me, so I'm happy to apply
> to my fixes branch.
Though having said that, a comment to go with the rmb() (as suggested by
checkpatch) to detail the situation we're concerned about would be nice
to have.
Cheers
James
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists