[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180413082648.GP4043@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 10:26:48 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] sched/core: uclamp: add CPU clamp groups accounting
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 05:56:09PM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> +static inline void uclamp_cpu_get(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int clamp_id)
> +{
> + struct uclamp_cpu *uc_cpu = &cpu_rq(cpu)->uclamp[clamp_id];
> +static inline void uclamp_cpu_put(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int clamp_id)
> +{
> + struct uclamp_cpu *uc_cpu = &cpu_rq(cpu)->uclamp[clamp_id];
That all seems daft, since you already have rq at the call site.
> +static inline void uclamp_task_update(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + int cpu = cpu_of(rq);
> + int clamp_id;
> +
> + /* The idle task does not affect CPU's clamps */
> + if (unlikely(p->sched_class == &idle_sched_class))
> + return;
> + /* DEADLINE tasks do not affect CPU's clamps */
> + if (unlikely(p->sched_class == &dl_sched_class))
> + return;
This is wrong; it misses the stop_sched_class.
And since you're looking at sched_class anyway, maybe put a marker in
there:
if (!p->sched_class->has_clamping)
return;
> + for (clamp_id = 0; clamp_id < UCLAMP_CNT; ++clamp_id) {
> + if (uclamp_task_affects(p, clamp_id))
> + uclamp_cpu_put(p, cpu, clamp_id);
> + else
> + uclamp_cpu_get(p, cpu, clamp_id);
> + }
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists