[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180413084019.GQ4043@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 10:40:19 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] sched/core: uclamp: add CPU clamp groups accounting
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 05:56:09PM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> +static inline void init_uclamp(void)
WTH is that inline?
> +{
> + struct uclamp_cpu *uc_cpu;
> + int clamp_id;
> + int cpu;
> +
> + mutex_init(&uclamp_mutex);
> +
> + for (clamp_id = 0; clamp_id < UCLAMP_CNT; ++clamp_id) {
> + /* Init CPU's clamp groups */
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + uc_cpu = &cpu_rq(cpu)->uclamp[clamp_id];
> + memset(uc_cpu, UCLAMP_NONE, sizeof(struct uclamp_cpu));
> + }
> + }
Those loops are the wrong way around, this shreds your cache. This is a
slow path so it doesn't much matter, but it is sloppy.
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists